SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Improving the Ability of Jurors to Comprehend and Apply Criminal Jury Instructions
5 references·16 citing·48 second hop
Improving the Ability of Jurors to Comprehend and Apply Criminal Jury Instructions (1982)Improving the Ability of Jurors to Compre…Making jury instructions understandable (1983)Making jury instructions unde…Making Legal Language Understandable: A Psycholinguistic Study of Jury Instructions (1979)Making Legal Language Underst…Juridic decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it? (1977)Juridic decisions: In ignoran…Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors. (1976)Guilt beyond a reasonable dou…Conflict, Decision and Dissonance (1965)Conflict, Decision and Disson…Objective and Subjective Comprehension of Jury Instructions in Criminal Trials (2014)Objective and Subjective Comp…REAL JURIES (2005)REAL JURIESEvaluating the comprehensibility of jury instructions: A method and an example. (2001)Evaluating the comprehensibil…What social science teaches us about the jury instruction process. (1997)What social science teaches u…Generic prejudice and the presumption of guilt in sex abuse trials. (1997)Generic prejudice and the pre…A ceiling or consistency effect for the comprehension of jury instructions. (1997)A ceiling or consistency effe…Comprehensibility of approved jury instructions in capital murder cases. (1995)Comprehensibility of approved…Trial complexity: A field investigation of its meaning and its effects. (1994)Trial complexity: A field inv…Comprehending life and death matters: A preliminary study of California's capital penalty instructions. (1994)Comprehending life and death …When prior knowledge and law collide: Helping jurors use the law. (1993)When prior knowledge and law …Instructing on death: Psychologists, juries, and judges. (1993)Instructing on death: Psychol…Comprehension of judges' instructions in the penalty phase of a capital trial: Focus on mitigating circumstances. (1992)Comprehension of judges' inst…A comparison of insanity defense standards on juror decision making. (1991)A comparison of insanity defe…Defining the Standard of Proof in Jury Instructions (1990)Defining the Standard of Proo…The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury. (1989)The eyewitness, the expert ps…The effect of jury nullification instruction on verdicts and jury functioning in criminal trials. (1985)The effect of jury nullificat…North Carolina Law Review (1927)Behavioral sciences and the law. (1966)Criminal Justice and Behavior (1980)"Empirical research on the insanity defense and attempted reforms: Evidence toward informed policy": Erratum. (1999)Socioeconomic Stratification and Mental Disorder (2009)Labeling and Stigma (2012)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy. (1987)Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysis (1989)Does expert psychological testimony inform or influence juror decision making? A social cognitive analysis. (1997)After 30 years, what do we know about what jurors know? A meta-analytic review of lay knowledge regarding eyewitness factors. (2010)Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control (1981)Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. (1994)ATTITUDES AND ATTITUDE CHANGE (1997)Understanding the limits of limiting instructions: Social psychological explanations for the failures of instructions to disregard pretrial publicity and other inadmissible evidence. (2000)Determining damages: The psychology of jury awards. (2003)Jury decision‐making biases and methods to counter them (2009)The American Jury. (1967)The American Jury (1971)Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. (1973)Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks (1986)Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: Effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule. (1987)Quality of decision making and group norms. (2001)Cognitive representations of semantic categories. (1975)Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories (1975)Describing jurors' personal conceptions of insanity and their relationship to case judgments. (2001)The everyday production of knowledge: individual differences in epistemological understanding and juror‐reasoning skill (2002)Child abuse in the eyes of the beholder: Lay perceptions of child sexual and physical abuse (2007)New York University Law Review (2017)Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)Statistical Principles in Experimental Design (1964)Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. (1968)Real jurors' understanding of the law in real cases. (1992)Complex scientific testimony: How do jurors make decisions? (1996)The Plain Language Movement (2012)The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion (1986)The heuristic model of persuasion. (1987)Capital jury deliberation: Effects on death sentencing, comprehension, and discrimination. (2009)Discourse in the us Courtroom (2012)Linguistic Human Rights (2012)Language in the Legal Process (1980)Linguistic and socioemotional influences on the accuracy of children's reports. (1996)Linguistic Complexity in Firm Disclosures: Obfuscation or Information? (2014)Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. (1998)Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. (2009)Media and Political Polarization (2013)Justice, liability, and blame: community views and the criminal law (1995)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1965Conflict, Decision and Dissonance1,343 cited
  • 1979Making Legal Language Understandable: A Psycholinguistic Study of Jury Instructions376 cited
  • 1977Juridic decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it?184 cited
  • 1976Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors.182 cited
  • 1983Making jury instructions understandable125 cited

Cited by

  • 1989The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury.119 cited
  • 1993When prior knowledge and law collide: Helping jurors use the law.115 cited
  • 1997What social science teaches us about the jury instruction process.108 cited
  • 1994Comprehending life and death matters: A preliminary study of California's capital penalty instructions.95 cited
  • 1991A comparison of insanity defense standards on juror decision making.94 cited
  • 1994Trial complexity: A field investigation of its meaning and its effects.86 cited
  • 1995Comprehensibility of approved jury instructions in capital murder cases.84 cited
  • 1990Defining the Standard of Proof in Jury Instructions71 cited
  • 1993Instructing on death: Psychologists, juries, and judges.67 cited
  • 2001

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Evaluating the comprehensibility of jury instructions: A method and an example.
65 cited
  • 1985The effect of jury nullification instruction on verdicts and jury functioning in criminal trials.61 cited
  • 1992Comprehension of judges' instructions in the penalty phase of a capital trial: Focus on mitigating circumstances.54 cited
  • 1997A ceiling or consistency effect for the comprehension of jury instructions.52 cited
  • 2014Objective and Subjective Comprehension of Jury Instructions in Criminal Trials50 cited
  • 2005REAL JURIES47 cited
  • 1997Generic prejudice and the presumption of guilt in sex abuse trials.46 cited