SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Backward evaluation in peer assessment: A scoping review
16 references·2 citing·42 second hopsampled
Backward evaluation in peer assessment: A scoping review (2021)Backward evaluation in peer assessment: A…The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies (2019)The Impact of Peer Assessment…Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis (2019)Does peer assessment promote …Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work (2017)Developing evaluative judgeme…Supporting Learners' Agentic Engagement With Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes (2016)Supporting Learners' Agentic …Peer assessment in the digital age: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher ratings (2015)Peer assessment in the digita…Feedback on feedback practice: perceptions of students and academics (2015)Feedback on feedback practice…Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design (2012)Rethinking models of feedback…Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Scoping studies: advancing th…Peer Assessment (2009)Peer AssessmentEffective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions (2009)Effective peer assessment pro…The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education (2008)The nature, reception, and us…The nature of feedback: how different types of peer feedback affect writing performance (2008)The nature of feedback: how d…A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class (2006)A comparative study of peer a…Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system (2005)Scaffolded writing and rewrit…Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks (2000)Student Peer Assessment in Hi…Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities (1998)Peer Assessment Between Stude…Using Peerceptiv to support AI-based online writing assessment across the disciplines (2023)Using Peerceptiv to support A…Impact of AI assistance on student agency (2023)Impact of AI assistance on st…Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice (2006)The Power of Feedback (2007)Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement (2008)The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback (2018)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. (1988)Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education (2013)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Thought and language (1962)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Book Reviews: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis Larry V. Hedges and Ingram Olkin New York: Academic Press, 1985. xxii + 369 pp (1988)Flawed Self-Assessment (2004)The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences (2007)Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (1978)The Impact of Classroom Evaluation Practices on Students (1988)Journal of Medical Education (2020)Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments? (2000)Potential Cultural Resistance to Pedagogical Imports: The Case of Communicative Language Teaching in China (2002)The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing (2005)Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning (2009)Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? (2009)To resist it or to embrace it? Examining ChatGPT’s potential to support teacher feedback in EFL writing (2023)Assessment and Classroom Learning (1998)Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy (2019)Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map (2020)Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems (1989)Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy (2020)Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis (1995)Trends in Peer Learning (2005)The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: a Meta-Analysis (2018)Technology Enhanced Learning in higher education; motivations, engagement and academic achievement (2019)What Is Agency? (1998)Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review (2015)RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach (2019)AI literacy and its implications for prompt engineering strategies (2024)Effects of an AI-supported approach to peer feedback on university EFL students' feedback quality and writing ability (2024)Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines (2024)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2010Scoping studies: advancing the methodology15,768 cited
  • 1998Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities2,336 cited
  • 2012Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design1,982 cited
  • 2000Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks1,360 cited
  • 2016Supporting Learners' Agentic Engagement With Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes959 cited
  • 2017Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work912 cited
  • 2009Peer Assessment838 cited
  • 2006A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class715 cited
  • 2008The nature of feedback: how different types of peer feedback affect writing performance619 cited
  • 2005Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system548 cited
  • 2009Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions536 cited
  • 2019The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies523 cited
  • 2019Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis423 cited
  • 2015Feedback on feedback practice: perceptions of students and academics261 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2008The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education230 cited
  • 2015Peer assessment in the digital age: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher ratings209 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Impact of AI assistance on student agency656 cited
    • 2023Using Peerceptiv to support AI-based online writing assessment across the disciplines44 cited