SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Systematic Review of Peer Assessment Design Elements
16 references·1 citing·49 second hop
A Systematic Review of Peer Assessment Design Elements (2023)A Systematic Review of Peer Assessment De…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies (2019)The Impact of Peer Assessment…Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis (2019)Does peer assessment promote …The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: a Meta-Analysis (2018)The impact of formative peer …Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the provider (2016)Exploring the value of peer f…Five Ways to Look at Cohen’s Kappa (2015)Five Ways to Look at Cohen’s …Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Calculating and reporting eff…Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions (2009)Effective peer assessment pro…Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and confidence intervals for effect sizes (2007)Effect sizes, confidence inte…Deciding on the Number of Classes in Latent Class Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study (2007)Deciding on the Number of Cla…Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utility (2006)Self and Peer Assessment in S…A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning (2005)A framework to analyze argume…Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks (2000)Student Peer Assessment in Hi…Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities (1998)Peer Assessment Between Stude…High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes (1990)High agreement but low Kappa:…Coefficient Kappa: Some Uses, Misuses, and Alternatives (1981)Coefficient Kappa: Some Uses,…A systematic review of the key components of online peer feedback practices in higher education (2023)A systematic review of the ke…A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes (1990)Bias, prevalence and kappa (1993)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2010)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Instructional Design Theories and Models (1983)Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? (2009)A review of feedback models and typologies: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements (2021)Structural Equations with Latent Variables (1989)Structural Equations with Latent Variables. (1991)An Introduction to Latent Class Growth Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling (2007)Identifying careless responses in survey data. (2012)Latent Class Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice (2020)The psychology of interpersonal relations. (1958)Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (1978)The Uses of Argument (2003)Content analysis: What are they talking about? (2005)Self-Regulation, Co-Regulation, and Shared Regulation in Collaborative Learning Environments (2017)The Role of Collaboration, Computer Use, Learning Environments, and Supporting Strategies in CSCL: A Meta-Analysis (2018)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Mini Meta‐Analysis of Your Own Studies: Some Arguments on Why and a Primer on How (2016)How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables (2019)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)Thought and language (1962)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment (2006)Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education (2013)Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. (2017)Reliability of Content Analysis: The Case of Nominal Scale Coding (1955)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments (1989)Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory (2003)Inter-Coder Agreement for Computational Linguistics (2008)Peer Review Negotiations: Revision Activities in ESL Writing Instruction (1994)Enhancing learning through self-assessment (1996)The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review (1999)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Power of Feedback (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Effects of self-assessment and peer-assessment interventions on academic performance: A meta-analysis (2022)The Digital Transformation of Higher Education Teaching: Four Pedagogical Prescriptions to Move Active Learning Pedagogy Forward (2022)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2007Deciding on the Number of Classes in Latent Class Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study11,376 cited
  • 2013Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs10,259 cited
  • 1990High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes3,024 cited
  • 1998Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities2,172 cited
  • 1981Coefficient Kappa: Some Uses, Misuses, and Alternatives1,575 cited
  • 2000Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks1,171 cited
  • 2005A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning886 cited
  • 2009Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions524 cited
  • 2019The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies443 cited
  • 2007Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and confidence intervals for effect sizes387 cited
  • 2006Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utility355 cited
  • 2019Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis350 cited
  • 2018The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: a Meta-Analysis

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

306 cited
  • 2015Five Ways to Look at Cohen’s Kappa296 cited
  • 2016Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the provider257 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023A systematic review of the key components of online peer feedback practices in higher education60 cited