SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Making jury instructions understandable
0 references·16 citing·51 second hopsampled
Making jury instructions understandable (1983)Making jury instructions understandableJury decision‐making biases and methods to counter them (2009)Jury decision‐making biases a…The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society (2004)The Blackwell Companion to La…What social science teaches us about the jury instruction process. (1997)What social science teaches u…Justice, liability, and blame: community views and the criminal law (1995)Justice, liability, and blame…Comprehensibility of approved jury instructions in capital murder cases. (1995)Comprehensibility of approved…Trial complexity: A field investigation of its meaning and its effects. (1994)Trial complexity: A field inv…Comprehending life and death matters: A preliminary study of California's capital penalty instructions. (1994)Comprehending life and death …Instructing on death: Psychologists, juries, and judges. (1993)Instructing on death: Psychol…A comparison of insanity defense standards on juror decision making. (1991)A comparison of insanity defe…Nonadversarial Methods for Sensitizing Jurors to Eyewitness Evidence (1990)Nonadversarial Methods for Se…Defining the Standard of Proof in Jury Instructions (1990)Defining the Standard of Proo…The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury. (1989)The eyewitness, the expert ps…Judge's Instruction on Eyewitness Testimony: Evaluation and Revision1 (1988)Judge's Instruction on Eyewit…Legal vs. quantified definitions of standards of proof. (1985)Legal vs. quantified definiti…Improving the Ability of Jurors to Comprehend and Apply Criminal Jury Instructions (1982)Improving the Ability of Juro…Legal and mental health system interactions (1981)Legal and mental health syste…From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception (1965)Attribution theory in social psychology (1967)Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Attributions of Blame and the Struggle over Apartheid (1999)Why People Obey the Law (2006)Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal Law (2009)The force of law: The effects of sexual orientation antidiscrimination legislation on interpersonal discrimination in employment. (2012)North Carolina Law Review (1927)Behavioral sciences and the law. (1966)Criminal Justice and Behavior (1980)"Empirical research on the insanity defense and attempted reforms: Evidence toward informed policy": Erratum. (1999)Socioeconomic Stratification and Mental Disorder (2009)Labeling and Stigma (2012)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy. (1987)Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysis (1989)Does expert psychological testimony inform or influence juror decision making? A social cognitive analysis. (1997)After 30 years, what do we know about what jurors know? A meta-analytic review of lay knowledge regarding eyewitness factors. (2010)Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. (1994)Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)Role‐Induced Bias in Court: An Experimental Analysis (2012)From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors’ decisions, impressions, and memory. (2014)Black Racial Stereotypes and Victim Blaming: Implications for Media Coverage and Criminal Proceedings in Cases of Police Violence against Racial and Ethnic Minorities (2017)Making Legal Language Understandable: A Psycholinguistic Study of Jury Instructions (1979)The Psychology of Evidence and Trial Procedure (1985)The impact of mental health evidence on support for capital punishment: are defendants labeled psychopathic considered more deserving of death? (2005)The impact of death qualification, belief in a just world, legal authoritarianism, and locus of control on venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials (2007)Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences (2013)Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control (1981)Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. (1994)ATTITUDES AND ATTITUDE CHANGE (1997)Understanding the limits of limiting instructions: Social psychological explanations for the failures of instructions to disregard pretrial publicity and other inadmissible evidence. (2000)Determining damages: The psychology of jury awards. (2003)Decision Theory and the Factfinding Process (1968)Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process (1971)Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors. (1976)Juror interpretations of ambiguous evidence: The need for cognition, presentation order, and persuasion. (1990)On measuring quantitative interpretations of reasonable doubt. (2008)Smartphones and Close Relationships: The Case for an Evolutionary Mismatch (2019)Conflict, Decision and Dissonance (1965)Juridic decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it? (1977)When prior knowledge and law collide: Helping jurors use the law. (1993)The American Jury. (1967)Judging the jury (1986)Jury Systems Around the World (2008)The Impact of Audit Evidence Documentation on Jurors' Negligence Verdicts and Damage Awards (2015)The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion (1986)The heuristic model of persuasion. (1987)Capital jury deliberation: Effects on death sentencing, comprehension, and discrimination. (2009)Discourse in the us Courtroom (2012)Linguistic Human Rights (2012)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 1995Justice, liability, and blame: community views and the criminal law251 cited
  • 1982Improving the Ability of Jurors to Comprehend and Apply Criminal Jury Instructions121 cited
  • 1989The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury.119 cited
  • 1997What social science teaches us about the jury instruction process.108 cited
  • 1994Comprehending life and death matters: A preliminary study of California's capital penalty instructions.95 cited
  • 1991A comparison of insanity defense standards on juror decision making.94 cited
  • 1994Trial complexity: A field investigation of its meaning and its effects.86 cited
  • 2009Jury decision‐making biases and methods to counter them84 cited
  • 1995Comprehensibility of approved jury instructions in capital murder cases.84 cited
  • 1985Legal vs. quantified definitions of standards of proof.82 cited
  • 1981Legal and mental health system interactions78 cited
  • 1990Nonadversarial Methods for Sensitizing Jurors to Eyewitness Evidence77 cited
  • 1990Defining the Standard of Proof in Jury Instructions71 cited
  • 2004The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society70 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1993
Instructing on death: Psychologists, juries, and judges.
67 cited
  • 1988Judge's Instruction on Eyewitness Testimony: Evaluation and Revision166 cited