References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

• 2002Computer-Mediated Epistemic Dialogue: Explanation and Argumentation as Vehicles for Understanding Scientific Notions229 cited
• 2003Computer-Mediated Argumentative Interactions for the Co-Elaboration of Scientific Notions164 cited
• 2013The Effect of Argumentative Task Goal on the Quality of Argumentative Discourse161 cited
• 2009Do goals affect the structure of students’ argumentative writing strategies?161 cited
• 2016Errors of Reasoning, Naturalizing the Logic of Inference158 cited
• 2000Judging the Quality of Peer-Led Student Dialogues144 cited
• 2009Argumentative Interactions and the Social Construction of Knowledge137 cited
• 2006Two Forms of the Straw Man103 cited
• 2008Argument Has No Function100 cited
• 2003Neither Naïve nor Critical Reconstruction: Dispute Mediators, Impasse, and the Design of Argumentation95 cited
• 2006Presumption and the Practices of Tentative Cognition86 cited
• 2012Teaching critical questions about argumentation through the revising process: effects of strategy instruction on college students’ argumentative essays81 cited
• 2014Burden of Proof, Presumption and Argumentation74 cited
• 2019Quality of argumentation by seventh‐graders in local socioscientific issues