Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Do people fake on personality inventories? A verbal protocol analysis

16 references·16 citing·45 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1977Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.11,945 cited
1977Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.11,315 cited
1986Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data4,346 cited
2001Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next?2,355 cited
2000Situation Trait Relevance, Trait Expression, and Cross-Situational Consistency: Testing a Principle of Trait Activation1,174 cited
1996Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring.924 cited
1990Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities.849 cited
1999Meta-Analyses of Fakability Estimates: Implications for Personality Measurement529 cited
1998The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions.486 cited
2000Variance in faking across noncognitive measures.409 cited
1999AN INTERNATIONAL LOOK AT SELECTION PRACTICES: NATION AND CULTURE AS EXPLANATIONS FOR VARIABILITY IN PRACTICE377 cited
2000The determinants of job seekers' reputation perceptions366 cited
1993Job postings and the decision to interview: A verbal protocol analysis.287 cited
1986THINKING AND MANAGING: A VERBAL PROTOCOL ANALYSIS OF MANAGERIAL PROBLEM SOLVING.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

253 cited

2005Reconsidering Forced-Choice Item Formats for Applicant Personality Assessment250 cited

2003Faking and selection: Considering the use of personality from select-in and select-out perspectives.236 cited

Cited by

2007ARE WE GETTING FOOLED AGAIN? COMING TO TERMS WITH LIMITATIONS IN THE USE OF PERSONALITY TESTS FOR PERSONNEL SELECTION284 cited
2009Faking and personality assessment in personnel selection: Advancing models of faking.133 cited
2011Financial analysts' evaluation of enhanced disclosure of non-financial performance indicators109 cited
2014Response Bias, Malingering, and Impression Management68 cited
2012The Selection Interview from the Interviewer and Applicant Perspectives: Can't Have One without the Other62 cited
2019The nature of faking: A homogeneous and predictable construct?50 cited
2014Comments on Item Selection Procedures45 cited
2015“F*** You, I Won’t Do What You Told Me!” – Response Biases as Threats to Psychological Assessment45 cited
2012What is in Applicants' Minds When They Fill Out a Personality Test? Insights from a qualitative study42 cited
2011First Dates and Little White Lies: A Trait Contract Classification Theory of Applicant Faking Behavior42 cited
2018Effects of Applicant Faking on Forced-Choice and Likert Scores40 cited
2016Cross‐Cultural Differences in Applicant Faking on Personality Tests: A 43‐Nation Study38 cited
2020Online decision aids: the role of decision-making styles and decision-making stages36 cited
2024Hacking the perfect score on high-stakes personality assessments with generative AI17 cited
2022Valence, Instrumentality, Expectancy, and Ability as Determinants of Faking, and the Effects of Faking on Criterion-Related Validity14 cited
2011Forced-choice and conventional personality assessment: Each may have unique value in pre-employment testing14 cited