Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Extreme response style in cross‐cultural research

16 references·16 citing·46 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1979A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs16,553 cited
1983Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values.15,062 cited
1970Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research14,051 cited
1987Consumer Ethnocentrism: Construction and Validation of the CETSCALE2,991 cited
1980Cross-Cultural Research Methods2,067 cited
1984Meaning-based translation : a guide to cross-language equivalence1,158 cited
1946Response Sets and Test Validity898 cited
1980The Optimal Number of Response Alternatives for a Scale: A Review814 cited
1950Further Evidence on Response Sets and Test Design734 cited
1960Yeasayers and naysayers: Agreeing response set as a personality variable.674 cited
1989Effects of Culture and Response Format on Extreme Response Style644 cited
2000Assessing Extreme and Acquiescence Response Sets in Cross-Cultural Research Using Structural Equations Modeling577 cited
1991A Cross-National Assessment of the Reliability and Validity of the CETSCALE569 cited
1977Translation: Applications and Research.538 cited
1993Differences in Managerial Values: A Study of U.S., Hong Kong and PRC Managers

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

512 cited

1965The great response-style myth.437 cited

Cited by

2017OECD Guidelines on Measuring Trust255 cited
2007Cross‐cultural differences in survey response patterns135 cited
2012Correcting Big Five Personality Measurements for Acquiescence: An 18–Country Cross–Cultural Study104 cited
2011A cross‐cultural comparison of perceived informational fairness with service failure explanations89 cited
2007An “Unfolding” Latent Variable Model for Likert Attitude Data80 cited
2014Response Styles and Personality Traits80 cited
2009On the Use of Factor-Analytic Multinomial Logit Item Response Models to Account for Individual Differences in Response Style78 cited
2013A Two-Decision Model for Responses to Likert-Type Items73 cited
2010Survey Response Styles, Acculturation, and Culture Among a Sample of Mexican American Adults73 cited
2016Measurement and control of bias in patient reported outcomes using multidimensional item response theory66 cited
2011Dealing with Extreme Response Style in Cross-Cultural Research: A Restricted Latent Class Factor Analysis Approach65 cited
2009Cross-National Response Styles in International Educational Assessments: Evidence from PISA 200665 cited
2004Values, trust, and commitment in business‐to‐business relationships57 cited
2013The antecedents of consumer satisfaction and loyalty in fast food industry49 cited
2016Mixture Random-Effect IRT Models for Controlling Extreme Response Style on Rating Scales41 cited
2006The Country-of-Origin Effect and Consumer Attitudes to “Buy Local” Campaign33 cited