Managing Seller–Buyer Relationships during New Product Development*

Gerard A. Athaide · Richard R. Klink

94 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Product Innovation Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Innovation and Knowledge Management Customer Service Quality and Loyalty Quality and Supply Management

Abstract

Ineffective relationship management with potential buyers during new product development (NPD) can be an important contributor to new product failure in technology‐based, industrial markets. However, empirical research on managing these relationships remains underdeveloped. This study addresses this deficiency by developing an empirically based taxonomy of relationship approaches used by sellers to develop technology‐based, industrial innovations, identifying situational characteristics that correlate with the choice of a particular relationship approach, and evaluating sellers' satisfaction with their relationship approach. The study's conceptual model is rooted in transaction cost analysis (TCA) and draws from extant literature on seller–buyer relationships during NPD. It was tested with data from 334 small to mid‐sized firms in a variety of technology‐based industrial markets. The results indicate that sellers use three basic relationship approaches during NPD: a bilateral approach, a buyer‐guided approach, and a seller‐guided approach. While the bilateral approach relies on a mutual exchange of information, the buyer‐guided and seller‐guided approaches do not. Juxtaposed with the high levels of satisfaction experienced by sellers in the sample, the study suggests that no one relationship approach is universally desirable. Therefore, managers may need to engage in a portfolio of relationship approaches with buyers during NPD; further, these approaches should correlate with buyer‐related (i.e., perceived buyer knowledge and prior relationship history) and innovation‐related (i.e., product customization and technological uncertainty) characteristics. Collectively, these results can help sellers optimize their relationships with buyers during NPD.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 94 citations exist upstream.

References

1981Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error 1980Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.1980Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors 1979A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs 1976Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications.1977Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys 1976Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems 1993Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences

Cited by

2012Determinants of knowledge transfer in inter‐firm new product development projects 2012How Buyer-Seller Relationship Quality Influences Adaptation and Innovation by Foreign MNCs’ Subsidiaries 2016Managing Interorganizational Innovation Projects: Mitigating the Negative Effects of Equivocality Through Knowledge Search Strategies 2013Help or Hindrance? Causal Ambiguity and Supplier Involvement in New Product Development Teams 2017Customers involvement and firm absorptive capacity in radical innovation: The case of technological spin-offs

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.