Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback

14 references·16 citing·34 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2005The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing900 cited
2008Evidence in support of written corrective feedback871 cited
1999The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to truscott (1996)856 cited
2004DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF PROMPTS AND RECASTS IN FORM-FOCUSED INSTRUCTION825 cited
2007The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners' Acquisition of Articles794 cited
1986Salience of Feedback on Error and Its Effect on EFL Writing Quality562 cited
2000Patterns of Teacher Response to Student Writing in a Multiple-Draft Composition Classroom: Is Content Feedback Followed by Form Feedback the Best Method?516 cited
1991An Experiment in the Relationship of Types of Written Feedback to the Development of Second-Language Writing Skills501 cited
2008The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students485 cited
1984Effects of the Red Pen397 cited
2003Response To Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Students378 cited
2007Is feedback pedagogically correct?326 cited
2000Focus on Form Through Interaction Enhancement: Integrating Formal Instruction Into a Communicative Task in EFL Classrooms253 cited
2002SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS' THEORIES ON THE USE OF ENGLISH ARTICLES

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

230 cited

Cited by

2015Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing217 cited
2019Teacher written corrective feedback: Less is more174 cited
2014The relative effects of peer and teacher feedback on improvement in EFL students’ writing ability116 cited
2014Learner uptake of teacher electronic feedback in ESL composition114 cited
2019The effects of feedback explicitness and type of target structure on accuracy in revision and new pieces of writing113 cited
2012Research into practice: Written corrective feedback108 cited
2015Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?102 cited
2011Evaluating the effectiveness of explicit instruction on implicit and explicit L2 knowledge97 cited
2020Feedback scope in written corrective feedback: Analysis of empirical research in L2 contexts94 cited
2010Written Corrective Feedback: What Do Students and Teachers Prefer and Why?.85 cited
2011The efficacy of dynamic written corrective feedback for university-matriculated ESL learners84 cited
2015Using automated writing evaluation to reduce grammar errors in writing81 cited
2015EFL teachers’ attempts at feedback innovation in the writing classroom77 cited
2019How Deeply Do Second Language Learners Process Written Corrective Feedback? Insights Gained From Think‐Alouds74 cited
2012The Effects of Direct Written Corrective Feedback on Improvement of Grammatical Accuracy of High- proficient L2 Learners74 cited
2021Exploring teacher written feedback in EFL writing classrooms: Beliefs and practices in interaction69 cited