Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

How often do leading biomedical journals use statistical experts to evaluate statistical methods? The results of a survey

11 references·9 citing·47 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2015The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013)510 cited
2016Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015370 cited
1994Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine324 cited
1966Statistical Evaluation of Medical Journal Manuscripts207 cited
1998Statistical reviewing for medical journals160 cited
1990An Exploratory Study of Statistical Assessment of Papers Published in the British Medical Journal130 cited
2007Statistical Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical Articles: A Randomized Trial112 cited
2019Calibrating the Scientific Ecosystem Through Meta-Research97 cited
1998Statistical reviewing policies of medical journals94 cited
1992The Lancet's statistical review process: areas for improvement by authors87 cited
2018AI peer reviewers unleashed to ease publishing grind75 cited

Cited by

2020Open Science Saves Lives: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic57 cited
2022An observational analysis of the trope “A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant” and other cut-and-paste statistical methods54 cited
2022Statistical Guidance to Authors at Top-Ranked Journals across Scientific Disciplines

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

21 cited

2022Use of preprint peer review to educate and enculturate science undergraduates12 cited

2023Thirty-year survey of bibliometrics used in the research literature of pain: Analysis, evolution, and pitfalls12 cited

2021Improving peer review of systematic reviews by involving librarians and information specialists: protocol for a randomized controlled trial12 cited

2024Poor statistical reporting: do we have a reason for concern? A narrative review and recommendations10 cited

2020Ten Points for High-Quality Statistical Reporting and Data Presentation10 cited

2022Recommendations to medical journals on ways to encourage statistical experts to review submissions9 cited