Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

How Careless Responding and Acquiescence Response Bias Can Influence Construct Dimensionality

16 references·16 citing·48 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2012lavaan : An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling27,889 cited
1992The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure.5,506 cited
2009New Well-being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings4,969 cited
2000The Psychology of Survey Response4,727 cited
1904The Psychological Bulletin4,187 cited
2012Identifying careless responses in survey data.3,840 cited
2009Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power3,489 cited
2010Work engagement a handbook of essential theory and research2,060 cited
2005The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal?1,339 cited
2011Detecting and Deterring Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys1,310 cited
2010Burnout and work engagement: A thorough investigation of the independency of both constructs.995 cited
2000Scaled and Adjusted Restricted Tests in Multi-Sample Analysis of Moment Structures890 cited
2013Caring about carelessness: Participant inattention and its effects on research852 cited
2002The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Counterproductive Behaviors766 cited
2004Ascertaining the validity of individual protocols from Web-based personality inventories

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

618 cited

2010Work Engagement595 cited

Cited by

2022Allying with AI? Reactions toward human-based, AI/ML-based, and augmented hiring processes147 cited
2020A little garbage in, lots of garbage out: Assessing the impact of careless responding in personality survey data143 cited
2018Examination of the validity of instructed response items in identifying careless respondents71 cited
2020Can Culture Be a Salient Predictor of Test-Taking Engagement? An Analysis of Differential Noneffortful Responding on an International College-Level Assessment of Critical Thinking54 cited
2016Should ratings of the importance of personal values be centered?49 cited
2021Linkages between market orientation and brand performance with positioning strategies of significant fashion apparels in Pakistan43 cited
2021On the Use of Balanced Item Parceling to Counter Acquiescence Bias in Structural Equation Models42 cited
2019Careless Responding Threatens Factorial Analytic Results and Construct Validity of Personality Measure39 cited
2018Investigating Response Heterogeneity in the Context of Positively and Negatively Worded Items by Using Factor Mixture Modeling39 cited
2022Incidence of Leader–Member Exchange Quality, Communication Satisfaction, and Employee Work Engagement on Self-Evaluated Work Performance37 cited
2023Why Do Regular and Reversed Items Load on Separate Factors? Response Difficulty vs. Item Extremity36 cited
2022Unveiling Concealable Stigmatized Identities in Class: The Impact of an Instructor Revealing Her LGBTQ+ Identity to Students in a Large-Enrollment Biology Course34 cited
2021The effects of a psychological brand contract breach on customers' dysfunctional behavior toward a brand23 cited
2023Mental Health Professionals’ Attitudes Toward Digital Mental Health Apps and Implications for Adoption in Portugal: Mixed Methods Study21 cited
2023Masculine Conformity and Social Dominance’s Relation With Organizational Culture Change19 cited
2024The Consequences of Age Discrimination via Perceived Work Ability: Downstream Effects on Well‐Being, Performance, and Motivation11 cited