Bargaining in an Asymmetrical Power Structure

Abstract

This study utilized a gaming experiment to compare the bargaining processes and outcomes in an asymmetrical power structure against those of a more balanced setting. Bargaining in the unbalanced condition was more “efficient,” but terms of agreement were much less predictable, and some weak members failed to obtain valued resources.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 300 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.