Uphill or Downhill? Locating the Firm on a Profit Function

Murali K. Mantrala · Prasad Anant Naik · Shrihari Sridhar · Esther Thorson

66 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Marketing

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing Marketing and Advertising Strategies Supply Chain and Inventory Management

Abstract

When deciding about changes in levels of multiple marketing investments aimed at improving profits, managers need to know whether they are on the uphill side or the downhill side of the profit function with respect to each investment variable. Spending errors made by an uphill-located firm that believes that it is a downhill-located firm can have serious consequences. This article offers an econometric “diagnostic tool” to infer a company's current location on a multivariable profit function and to determine the changes in investments that will take the company to the neighborhood of the maximum profit. The authors apply the proposed approach to daily newspaper industry data and investigate the optimality of companies' allocation behaviors with respect to three marketing efforts: investments in quality, distribution, and advertising space sales effort. A novel feature of this problem setting is that it involves a “dual-revenue” market with possibly interrelated demands for subscriptions and advertising space. The authors derive normative rules for marketing investments in four dual-revenue market types. The empirical analysis finds that daily newspapers' dual revenues are positively interrelated and that a majority of these companies are located near the optimal level of spending for quality, a surprising finding considering that previous studies have characterized marketing managers as overspenders. Indeed, when these companies are suboptimal, they are much more likely to be underspending (i.e., they are located on the uphill side of the profit function) than overspending. In addition, the research furnishes estimates of sales elasticities with respect to quality, personal selling, and distribution investments, which are sparsely available in the extant literature.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 66 citations exist upstream.

References

1986On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities 1970Efficient Inference in a Random Coefficient Regression Model 1997Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations 2007Strategic Brand Management 2002Some Evidence on the Importance of Sticky Prices 1993An Empirical Pooling Approach for Estimating Marketing Mix Elasticities with PIMS Data 2004Measuring Marketing Productivity: Current Knowledge and Future Directions 2000Market Segmentation

Cited by

2011Dynamic Marketing Budgeting for Platform Firms: Theory, Evidence, and Application 2020Estimating Network Effects in Two-Sided Markets 2019Can Advertising Investments Counter the Negative Impact of Shareholder Complaints on Firm Value?2012Optimizable and implementable aggregate response modeling for marketing decision support 2016Optimizing a Menu of Multiformat Subscription Plans for Ad-Supported Media Platforms 2018Sales Force Downsizing and Firm-Idiosyncratic Risk: The Contingent Role of Investors’ Screening and Firm’s Signaling Processes

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.